Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: No, because of null move

Author: Rémi Coulom

Date: 02:02:36 06/02/02

Go up one level in this thread

null move may fail to solve zugzwang positions correctly

Rémi

• Re: No, because of null move James T. Walker 05:53:45 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 07:49:06 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Pham Minh Tri 06:40:02 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 09:26:53 06/02/02
      • Re: No, because of null move Pham Minh Tri 06:16:11 06/03/02
        • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 12:21:08 06/03/02
        • Re: No, because of null move Christophe Theron 12:16:41 06/03/02
    • Re: No, because of null move James T. Walker 07:10:34 06/02/02
• Re: No, because of null move Uri Blass 02:37:27 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Russell Reagan 20:51:30 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Uri Blass 21:26:35 06/02/02
      • Re: No, because of null move Ricardo Gibert 18:39:19 06/03/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 07:46:34 06/02/02
• Re: Thanks Remi ,( NT) Terry Ripple 02:05:44 06/02/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.