Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: No, because of null move

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 02:37:27 06/02/02

Go up one level in this thread

On June 02, 2002 at 05:02:36, Rémi Coulom wrote:

>null move may fail to solve zugzwang positions correctly
>
>Rémi

Junior does not use a null move and even programs that use the null move do not
use it in evcery position and they may have some zunzwang verification.

I think that you assume here too much.

I think that there are different reasons that may prevent them to solve problems
without tablebases.

One reason is if there is a limit on the depth that they search but it is
dependent on the programs and we can make generalizations about every program.

Uri

• Re: No, because of null move Russell Reagan 20:51:30 06/02/02
  • Re: No, because of null move Uri Blass 21:26:35 06/02/02
    • Re: No, because of null move Ricardo Gibert 18:39:19 06/03/02
• Re: No, because of null move Rémi Coulom 07:46:34 06/02/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.