Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:40:34 06/02/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2002 at 04:25:16, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 02, 2002 at 04:14:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 02, 2002 at 03:20:50, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On June 01, 2002 at 23:23:44, James Swafford wrote: >>> >>>>I don't get it. Are you claiming the setup is flawed? >>>>Sorry to hear that, if that's the case. That sucks for sure. >>> >>>That seems to be the case. It hurts especially in this game, >>>because it made a 1-0 into a 0-1 >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>We do not know if Sjeng could win without 1.f4 in that game and we have not >>enough data to know if the wrong setup changed the result from a win to a loss. > >I'm not talking about f4, I'm talking about not playing a tablebase win >and losing the game. > >-- >GCP I understand but it is possible that without 1.f4 it could not get that tablebase position and could lose or draw by a different way and I guess we never know. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.