Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No, because of null move

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 21:26:35 06/02/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 02, 2002 at 23:51:30, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On June 02, 2002 at 05:37:27, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>Junior does not use a null
>
>First, I'd like to know how do you know that? Like if you saw it in a post, or
>asked the authors.

I remember it from Amir Ban's words.

>
>Second, do you know what it uses instead of null move? Surely it must use some
>pruning technique to get such good search depths.

I do not know exactly the pruning techniques that are used by Junior but I know
that the depth that Junior says is not brite force depth and usually Junior
search only 1/2 of the depth that is written.

Most moves are considered as depth 2 by Junior based on my knowledge but
important moves may be considered as depth 1(good captures or threats)
>
>Uri, you always seem to know these little factoids about engines, and I find
>them very interesting. Like how Tiger uses the "filter" pruning technique. That
>is also very interesting.

I know because I read CCC for years.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.