Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:52:21 06/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 02, 2002 at 21:08:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: >I consider Diep the winner here. Do you say that Dual 2000 is more than 2 times faster than Dual 1200? I know that Mhz means nothing and this is the reason that I ask. If the hardware of Fritz was exactly 2 times faster than the hardware of diep then even after considering the hardware I consider Fritz as the program with the best result. I believe that a point worth slightly more than doubling the speed. I believe that most players will be happy to have a deal to add them one point in the end of the tournament and play with hardware that is 2 times slower. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.