Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 02:55:33 06/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2002 at 03:52:21, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 02, 2002 at 21:08:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>I consider Diep the winner here. > > >Do you say that Dual 2000 is more than 2 times faster than Dual 1200? I did NOT implied that, but a Dual 2000 could produce one or more different moves than a dual 1200 during any given game, and those key moves could be change the entire result. Jorge > >I know that Mhz means nothing and this is the reason that I ask. >If the hardware of Fritz was exactly 2 times faster than the hardware of diep >then even after considering the hardware I consider Fritz as the program with >the best result. > >I believe that a point worth slightly more than doubling the speed. > >I believe that most players will be happy to have a deal to add them one point >in the end of the tournament and play with hardware that is 2 times slower. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.