Author: pavel
Date: 12:26:10 06/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2002 at 15:23:19, Roy Eassa wrote: >On June 02, 2002 at 17:40:09, pavel wrote: > >>On June 02, 2002 at 17:39:30, pavel wrote: >> >>>On June 02, 2002 at 17:33:52, Dana Turnmire wrote: >>> >>>>I ran this position with Genius 3 on an AMD 1.8G 256RAM and after almost 8 hours >>>>Genius still could not avoid the losing move. >>>> >>>>In "The Mammouth Book of Chess" Graham Burgess gives this position as an example >>>>of how computers are materialistic. 1 Nxc5? the obvious materialistic move >>>>throws away the win. >>>> >>>>Can any of the modern programs avoid the losing move? Would endgame tablebases >>>>help? >>>[D]4N3/1K1P1p2/3p1p2/1k6/8/8 b - - 0 1 >> >> >>something is wring with the string. > >somethong is wrong with the strong? >somethang is wrang with the strang? no. something is better than nothing. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.