Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:33:27 06/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 03, 2002 at 15:26:21, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On June 03, 2002 at 14:29:25, Dante Rosati wrote: > >>some claim that the lunsen opening book is superior to powerbook. Is there any >>basis for this? Has anyone run games with the two opening books against each >>other? >> >>Dante > >And did it appear to the guys who claim that book X is better than book Y, that >just maybe it could also depend on the engine which uses it? And against which >opponent? And with which time control? And on the number of screen savers >running with the engine simultanously? And most likely other things I didn't >mention now? Does the engine learn openings problems as it plays? Does the engine *understand* a gambit when it falls out of the book into one? Does the engine *understand* a positional advantage when it falls out of the book into one? Some books are clearly better than others. But to prove it will take a lot of work.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.