Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 12:52:20 06/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 04, 2002 at 15:35:47, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 04, 2002 at 15:30:28, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On June 04, 2002 at 15:24:21, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On June 04, 2002 at 14:55:08, Roy Eassa wrote: >>> >>>>On June 04, 2002 at 14:52:49, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 04, 2002 at 10:13:05, Art Basham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>White wins by playing 1.BxP+... >>>>>> >>>>>>[D]3qrrnk/ppnbbppp/2p5/2PpBP2/1P1P3R/P2B2N1/6PP/R2Q2K1 w - - >>>>>> >>>>>>The Novag Amber finds it in 55 sec. >>>>>> >>>>>>Novag Super VIP in 23 sec. >>>>>> >>>>>>I do not think the new Touch Chess would find this one..:-) >>>>>> >>>>>>art >>>>> >>>>>Time for solution: >>>>> >>>>>- ChessTiger 14.9 Palm = 2m19s >>>>>- ChessGenius 1.4 Palm = 7m12s >>>>> >>>>>Kurt >>>> >>>> >>>>Something is strange here, because Tiger on my Palm announced mate-in-7 in 13 >>>>seconds! (Tiger 14.9a on Sony Clie at 42 MHz.) >>> >>>I have again checked, but this time ChessTiger 14.9 [not 14.9.a] required 132 >>>seconds to announce mate in 7 [Palm 16 MHz] >>>Kurt >> >> >>I am surprised by a factor of 10 between such close versions and a factor of >>only 2.63 difference in MHz. What do you get for the Speed Index (TigerMark)? >>I get 1.14. > >My TigerMark index is 0.39 >Kurt OK, my Palm's MHz is 2.63 times yours and its TigerMark is 3.59 times yours, but its solution time is better than 10x as fast as yours. I guess it's not impossible that the rest is just version 14.9a versus 14.9 (surprising, but not impossible). Christophe, you listening?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.