Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:11:27 06/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2002 at 06:00:07, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 05, 2002 at 05:45:39, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On June 05, 2002 at 03:21:33, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >> >>>[D] r2bk3/1p2n2p/p2Q2p1/6n1/6P1/4B3/PqP2RBP/6K1 b - - am Nf7 bm h6 >>> >>>A few moves later Sjeng failed by 24...Nf7?, instead of 24...h6, which seems to >>>be unclear or drawish. > >In the original position, the difference between the two moves is very small >even in my program. It is also the case in a lot of positions in the GCP test suite and I wonder if you think to have a different test suite in order to help you to test changes in the search rules. I do not know of a tactical test suite when the difficulty of the positions is similiar to the GCP test suite but programs do not find the right move for the wrong reason and do not change their mind fromm the right move to the wrong move unless they have some bug. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.