Author: martin fierz
Date: 19:32:16 06/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 05, 2002 at 16:42:26, Dann Corbit wrote: >Automated computer analysis seems to be making great strides. If you examine >the fully automated analysis found at http://www.convekta.com/commented.asp you >will see what sort of information can be formed with the current technology with >no human intervention. i took a look at one game, and really, it is quite hmm, what now? boring? useless? not-to-the-point? just citing other games and adding computer analysis to a game is of very little interest to a human who wants to know what's going on in a game. i want to know what the key ideas are in a position, and i don't get a thing from these lines, with one exception: if there is a blunder, the computer tells me. that's all. >A very similar system will be used by the Chess Analysis >Project, Phase II. dann, why on earth doesn't CAP have a decent website? or am i just too stupid to find it? no, FTP doesnt count as a website in my book - that was 10 years ago :-) and with all the work you have put in CAP, what have you found so far? that would be something for the website... aloha martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.