Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 23:27:23 06/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
As all of the other posters have stated, that isn't what I consider analysis. If we're going to talk about this kind of cryptic analysis, then even Fritz is better, since it at least gives a score which tells you more than the "analysis" that was given on that website. Perhaps we were all expecting something great, like analysis in English, and were disappointed. I think even I could write a program to give some simple analysis in English and reasons why it made a move and reasons why it didn't make other moves. Of course it would be repetitive, like, "The move [insert move here] was best because [insert reason here]." Then you could give it commands to ask why it rejected a certain line, and it would give a standard line of, "The move [insert move here] was rejected because [insert reason here]." The reasons would probably be like, "white has superior mobility after the move [insert move here]" and "black's king is potentially unsafe after the move [insert move here]". It would take some work to get it all working smoothly, but if there is a team working on this sort of thing, I would think that they would at least have something on par with what I described above, or something like what the Chessmaster series' have had at least. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.