Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:15:09 06/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2002 at 06:59:45, stuart taylor wrote: >Thanks Pavel, >This was all very interesting and very worthwhile, I believe. >But it makes it look like like Fritz may be the one which benefits more from >longer times than Hiarcs. > >(some people might say that this proves that Hiarcs is the greatest, because >there were not enough games anyway ha ha ha, but even though I can see their >point in a way, I still think that there are other factors which also have a >say). >Thanks >S.Taylor It is also possible that both sides earn the same from time and Fritz is simply better at every time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.