Author: Jorge
Date: 06:37:44 06/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 06, 2002 at 08:15:09, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 06, 2002 at 06:59:45, stuart taylor wrote: > >>Thanks Pavel, >>This was all very interesting and very worthwhile, I believe. >>But it makes it look like like Fritz may be the one which benefits more from >>longer times than Hiarcs. >> >>(some people might say that this proves that Hiarcs is the greatest, because >>there were not enough games anyway ha ha ha, but even though I can see their >>point in a way, I still think that there are other factors which also have a >>say). >>Thanks >>S.Taylor > >It is also possible that both sides earn the same from time and Fritz is simply >better at every time control. > >Uri Very interesting experiment. It is also possible that they are both very close in strength, 10 games only and 50% of the games were draws. I guess we will find out from SSDF. jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.