Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:53:58 06/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 07, 2002 at 13:39:48, Telmo Escobar wrote: >On June 07, 2002 at 00:31:31, David Hanley wrote: > >>I saw an older fellow win his section playing like this, so it's not just >>"anticomputer" >> >>dave > > Right. I have lost more than once to this kind of setup. It's unfair to call >it "anticomputer", as this sounds despective. There is nothing basically wrong >in >White playing like 1.d4 d5 2.c3, 3.e3, 4.f4 and so on. One has to learn how to >get a reasonable game against this setup. This is about chess, period. > Rafael won these games because he played good chess. > > Telmo You hit the Nail right on its head, Rafael is an excellent player, he score 5.5 points on a tournament where the average rating was over 2400, there were IMs and GMs such as Jan Tinman. Rafael might NOT have an established rating yet, but he could easy be over 2400. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.