Author: Kevin Strickland
Date: 19:26:02 06/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
>You are not representing the truth. You take positions too far. >perhap syou learn one day WHEN having TBs is good thing. > >having TBs is good to prevent exchange TOWARDS drawn or lost endgames, >*moves* before they get on the board. > >understand? In these games by the time that tbs would have _been_ useful Diep was either in a draw, or lost. How would tbs help in any of the situations BEFORE they can take effect? Suddenly they are used in the middlegame? Come on Vincent.. tbs would not have enabled you to win the event. If at most they would have helped gain .5 points. That still leaves you in the same spot. That is all I am trying to prove.. tbs would not have helped you win the event. You lost the event due to Diep playing poorly in the middlegame.. not the endgames... one step at a time... Unless of course there were 32 man tbs in '99 that we all don't know about.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.