Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:11:30 06/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2002 at 17:02:09, Scott Gasch wrote: >On June 08, 2002 at 23:47:41, Will Singleton wrote: > >>4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - >> > > 1u -4.04 00:00:00.01 14 PV= f5 1. Qxh5+ [Q] Kg8 [Q] <-3.00> > 1u +1.35 00:00:00.01 16 PV= g6 <+0.00> > 1u +2.63 00:00:00.04 29 PV= Nxb2 <+1.00> > 1. +2.63 00:00:00.11 60 PV= Nxb2 <+1.00> > 2. +2.05 00:00:00.22 290 PV= Nxb2 1. Ne5 <+1.00> > 3. +2.36 00:00:00.33 1209 PV= Nxb2 1. Ne5 Nc4 <+1.00> > 4. +2.19 00:00:00.47 7327 PV= Nxb2 1. Ra7 Qb6 2. g4 <+1.00> > 5. +2.25 00:00:00.65 26663 PV= Nxb2 1. Ra8 Nc4 2. Nd4 b4 <+1.00> > 6. +1.51 00:00:01.02 92805 PV= Nxb2 1. Ra8 Qc7 2. Qh8+ Kg6 [1rep] > > 3. Rc8 Qb6 4. g4 <+1.00> > 7. +0.69 00:00:03.09 579394 PV= Nxb2 1. Ra8 Kh6 2. Ra7 Qb6 3. Qh8+ > > Kg6 [1rep] 4. Ne7+ Bxe7 5. Rxe7 > > [recap] <+1.00> > 8u -0.23 00:00:06.01 1341561 PV= Qc7 1. Ra8 Nb6 2. Rd8 Na4 3. Qh8+ > > Kg6 [1rep] 4. Rc8 Bh2+ 5. Kh1 > > Qd6 <+0.00> > 8u -0.09 00:00:07.47 1745978 PV= Nb6 1. Nd4 b4 2. Nf5 Bf4 3. cxb4 > > Bg6 4. Qe7 Qxe7 [Q] 5. Nxe7 [Q] > > <-1.00> > 8u -0.03 00:00:09.07 2159150 PV= Bc5 1. Ra8 Bd1 2. Rb8 Qc7 3. h4 > > Qf4 4. hxg5 Bxf2+ [Q] 5. Kh1 [Q] > > Nxb2 [Q] 6. Rxb5 [Q] <+0.00> > 8. -0.03 00:00:12.42 3025046 PV= Bc5 1. Ra8 Bd1 2. Rb8 Qc7 3. h4 > > Qf4 4. hxg5 Bxf2+ [Q] 5. Kh1 [Q] > > Nxb2 [Q] 6. Rxb5 [Q] <+0.00> > 9u -0.09 00:00:22.15 5696036 PV= Nb6 1. Nd4 Bg6 2. Qxb5 f6 3. Nf5 > > Bc7 4. Qd3 Nc4 <-1.00> > 9u +0.00 00:00:28.12 7358611 PV= Ne5 1. Nxe5 Qe4 2. g4 Bxe5 3. Ra8 > > Qb1+ 4. Kg2 [1rep] Qe4+ 5. Kg1 > > [DRAW/REP] > 9. +0.00 00:00:28.67 7495575 PV= Ne5 1. Nxe5 Qe4 2. g4 Bxe5 3. Ra8 > > Qb1+ 4. Kg2 [1rep] Qe4+ 5. Kg1 > > [DRAW/REP] >10. +0.00 00:00:56.53 15154600 PV= Ne5 1. Nxe5 Qe4 2. g4 Bxe5 3. Ra8 > > Qb1+ 4. Kg2 [1rep] Qe4+ 5. Kg1 > > [DRAW/REP] >11. +0.00 00:01:52.36 30695051 PV= Ne5 1. Nxe5 Qe4 2. g4 Bxe5 3. Ra8 > > Qb1+ 4. Kg2 [1rep] Qe4+ 5. Kg1 > > [DRAW/REP] >12. +0.00 00:05:14.50 86217936 PV= Ne5 1. Nxe5 Qe4 2. g4 Bxe5 3. Ra8 > > Qb1+ 4. Kg2 [1rep] Qe4+ 5. Kg1 > > [DRAW/REP] > >Is the trick here to see a draw score or the queen move? No The problem is mainly to see that Nxb2 is a tactical mistake. Some prorams simply do not see it and change their mind for a different reason and it means that the positions is a bad test position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.