Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 01:08:52 06/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2002 at 04:10:06, Slater Wold wrote: >On June 08, 2002 at 23:47:41, Will Singleton wrote: > >>[D]4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - > >White(1): setboard 4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - >Black(1): go > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > (2) 6-> 0.13 -1.63 1. ... Nxb2 2. Ra8 Qc7 3. Rb8 Bh2+ > 4. Kf1 Nd3 5. Rxb5 > 7 0.22 -1.42 1. ... Nxb2 2. Ra8 Kh6 3. Qh8+ Kg6 > 4. Rg8 f6 5. Nd8 Qe7 > 7-> 0.38 -1.42 1. ... Nxb2 2. Ra8 Kh6 3. Qh8+ Kg6 > 4. Rg8 f6 5. Nd8 Qe7 > 8 0.45 -- 1. ... Nxb2 > 8 0.84 -0.59 1. ... Nxb2 2. Ra8 g4 3. Ra7 Qb6 4. > hxg4 Bxg4 5. Rxf7 Nd3 <HT> > 8 1.38 -0.78 1. ... Bc5 2. Ra8 Qc7 3. Qh8+ Kg6 4. > Rg8 f6 5. b3 Bd1 6. Rc8 > 8 2.70 -0.89 1. ... Nd2 2. Ra7 Qb6 3. Ra8 Qc5 4. > Nd4 b4 5. Qh8+ Kg6 6. Rd8 > (4) 8-> 2.70 -0.89 1. ... Nd2 2. Ra7 Qb6 3. Ra8 Qc5 4. > Nd4 b4 5. Qh8+ Kg6 6. Rd8 > 9 2.78 -- 1. ... Nd2 > (3) 9 3.09 -0.01 1. ... Nd2 2. Ra7 Qb6 3. Ra8 Bf8 4. > Ne5 Qc7 5. Nxf7 Qxf7 6. Qxf7 Bxf7 7. > Rxf8 > (2) 9 4.88 -0.65 1. ... Bc5 2. Ra8 Kh6 3. Rc8 Bb6 4. > Qh8+ Kg6 5. g4 Nd6 6. gxh5+ Kf6 7. > Rg8 Qxc6 8. Rxg7 > 9-> 7.03 -0.65 1. ... Bc5 2. Ra8 Kh6 3. Rc8 Bb6 4. > Qh8+ Kg6 5. g4 Nd6 6. gxh5+ Kf6 7. > Rg8 Qxc6 8. Rxg7 > 10 8.30 -- 1. ... Bc5 > 10 11.13 -0.02 1. ... Bc5 2. Ra8 Kh6 3. b4 Bd6 4. > Nd4 g4 5. Nxb5 gxh3 6. Qh8+ Kg6 7. > Nxd6 Nxd6 8. gxh3 > 10 14.52 -0.04 1. ... Qc7 2. Ra8 g4 3. hxg4 Bxg4 4. > Ra7 Bh2+ 5. Kh1 Qf4 6. Rxf7 Bh5 7. > Rxf4 Bxe8 > 10 26.94 -0.62 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Qb5 f6 4. cxb4 > Qc7 5. Qd3+ Bg6 6. Qc3 Be4 > (3) 10-> 26.94 -0.62 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Qb5 f6 4. cxb4 > Qc7 5. Qd3+ Bg6 6. Qc3 Be4 > (2) 11 31.67 -0.49 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Nf5 Qd5 4. > Nxd6 Qxd6 5. Qe4+ Bg6 6. Qxb4 Qxb4 > 7. cxb4 Nc4 8. b3 > 11-> 37.94 -0.49 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Nf5 Qd5 4. > Nxd6 Qxd6 5. Qe4+ Bg6 6. Qxb4 Qxb4 > 7. cxb4 Nc4 8. b3 > 12 1:00 -0.59 1. ... Nb6 2. Ra5 Bg6 3. Rxb5 f6 4. > Qd8 Bc7 5. Qe7 Qxc6 6. Rc5 Bd6 7. Rxc6 > Bxe7 8. Rxb6 > 12-> 1:12 -0.59 1. ... Nb6 2. Ra5 Bg6 3. Rxb5 f6 4. > Qd8 Bc7 5. Qe7 Qxc6 6. Rc5 Bd6 7. Rxc6 > Bxe7 8. Rxb6 > 13 2:24 -0.46 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Nf5 Nc8 4. > Qd8 Bf4 5. Qf8 Be5 6. Re1 Bf6 7. cxb4 > Bxb2 > time=3:00 cpu=399% mat=0 n=294327824 fh=92% nps=1632k > ext-> chk=11768270 cap=364473 pp=98340 1rep=1537799 mate=87824 > predicted=0 nodes=294327824 evals=43283470 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > hashing-> trans/ref=28% pawn=99% used=99% > SMP-> split=890 stop=147 data=8/32 cpu=12:00 elap=3:00 cpu=399% looks odd on a dual. The same with cpu=12:00 together with elap=3:00. I noticed this bug on my machine too. Perhaps Bob will have a look at this. Kind regards Bernhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.