Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:44:57 06/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2002 at 04:56:56, Peter Kappler wrote: >On June 10, 2002 at 03:20:45, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 09, 2002 at 18:01:47, Peter Kappler wrote: >> >>>On June 09, 2002 at 03:34:26, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On June 09, 2002 at 00:28:44, Peter Kappler wrote: >>>> >>>>>On June 08, 2002 at 23:47:41, Will Singleton wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>[D]4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - >>>>>> >>>>>>Amateur 2 plays Qc7 at 70 sec. The first amateur program who can beat this >>>>>>time, or find a better move, gets a copy of Hsu's new book, when available. >>>>>>Must be submitted by the author. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Grok switches from Nxb2 to Bc5 after 50 seconds, and starts returning a >>>>>drawscore at ply 10. Don't know if Bc5 is better than Qc7... >>>>> >>>>> 5 13 1.562s 152296 98knps Nxb2 g4 Bg6 Ra8 Kh6 Qh8+ Bh7 >>>>> 5 13 1.572s 153126 97knps Nxb2 g4 Bg6 Ra8 Kh6 Qh8+ Bh7 >>>>> 6 13 1.743s 190077 109knps Nxb2 g4 Bg6 Ra8 Kh6 Qh8+ <h1> >>>>> 6 13 2.814s 419714 149knps Nxb2 g4 Bg6 Ra8 Kh6 Qh8+ <h1> >>>>> 7 5 5.017s 956621 191knps Nxb2 Ra8 g4 Ra7 Qb6 hxg4 Nd3 >>>>> 7 5 7.932s 1629265 205knps Nxb2 Ra8 g4 Ra7 Qb6 hxg4 Nd3 >>>>> 8 11 10.585s 2267711 214knps Nxb2 Ra8 g4 Ra7 Qb6 hxg4 Bg6 Qd7 >>>>> 8 11 14.411s 3262810 226knps Nxb2 Ra8 g4 Ra7 Qb6 hxg4 Bg6 Qd7 >>>>> 9 -1 50.322s 13361462 266knps Bc5 Ra8 Qc7 Qh8+ Kg6 Rg8 f5 b4 Bd6 Rc8 >>>>> 9 -1 80.095s 20862554 260knps Bc5 Ra8 Qc7 Qh8+ Kg6 Rg8 f5 b4 Bd6 Rc8 >>>>> 10 0 119.101s 32176831 270knps Bc5 Ra8 Qc7 Qh8+ Kg6 Rg8 Bxf2+ Kxf2 >>>>>Qf4+ Kg1 Qc1+ Kh2 Qf4+ <h2> >>>>> >>>>>Hardware: AMD 1.4 GHz >>>>> >>>>>-Peter >>>> >>>> >>>>I only know that Grok did not find it for a tactical reason. >>>> >>> >>>All I know is that Grok failed low while searching Nxb2 at depth 9. I don't >>>know how you can be so certain that it didn't see a tactical problem with the >>>move. >>> >>>-Peter >> >>I thought based on the scores that it did not see a tactical problem with that >>move but now when I check it again I seee that Grok has no score at depth 9 for >>Nxb2 so it simply hides information from me in it's pvs. >> >>Grok is not one of the top programs and it is weaker than movei so I suspect >>that if movei need some minutes to fail low for tactical reasons then it means >>that Grok need more time. > >It seems your original statement was an educated guess, and not a statement of >fact. It's definitely not the case that a stronger program will always solve a >problem faster than a weaker one. > >I don't know anything about your engine, except that it's apparently stronger >than Grok. How did you reach this conclusion? Do you play on ICC? > >-Peter No I simply confused between it and another engine with similiar name. I apolgize.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.