Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 18:13:26 06/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2002 at 04:08:52, Bernhard Bauer wrote: >On June 09, 2002 at 04:10:06, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On June 08, 2002 at 23:47:41, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>[D]4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - >> >>White(1): setboard 4Q3/1q3ppk/2Nb4/1p4pb/2n5/2P4P/1P3PP1/R5K1 b - - >>Black(1): go >> clearing hash tables >> time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) >> nss depth time score variation (1) >>starting thread 1 >> (2) 6-> 0.13 -1.63 1. ... Nxb2 2. Ra8 Qc7 3. Rb8 Bh2+ >> 4. Kf1 Nd3 5. Rxb5 <SNIP> >> 13 2:24 -0.46 1. ... Nb6 2. Nd4 b4 3. Nf5 Nc8 4. >> Qd8 Bf4 5. Qf8 Be5 6. Re1 Bf6 7. cxb4 >> Bxb2 >> time=3:00 cpu=399% mat=0 n=294327824 fh=92% nps=1632k >> ext-> chk=11768270 cap=364473 pp=98340 1rep=1537799 mate=87824 >> predicted=0 nodes=294327824 evals=43283470 >> endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 >> hashing-> trans/ref=28% pawn=99% used=99% >> SMP-> split=890 stop=147 data=8/32 cpu=12:00 elap=3:00 > >cpu=399% looks odd on a dual. The same with cpu=12:00 together with elap=3:00. >I noticed this bug on my machine too. >Perhaps Bob will have a look at this. >Kind regards >Bernhard I would like to know the answer to this as well. Does this happen with everyone on Windows machines who has 2 processors? Since I wrote the code fragment to get real CPU-time under Windows, I'm interested to know exactly what is wrong, so I can try to fix it. Thanks, Jeremiah
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.