Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 22:39:40 06/10/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 10, 2002 at 16:34:33, Pat King wrote: >>If this is correct, this might be an interesting way of handling check >>extensions or threat extensions. > >I've always handled extensions pretty conventionally. What are you thinking, >that the move generators can set some flag if they find captures or checks? What I had in mind was that if the white king was in check, you could simply generate ONLY the white king moves rather easiliy when compared with the switch statement approach to move generation. I have some other ideas where this might be beneficial too, but I'll hold on to those ideas for now :) Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.