Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:54:43 06/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2002 at 15:00:18, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >This could be okay. Comet looks to many more nodes per iteration than Crafty. > >However look at the analysis of the B.46 DOS exe (K6/450). > >Comet-B.46 Tue Jun 11 21:03:24 2002 > >depth score sec nodes pv > 1. +2.11 0 821 d4e5 > 2. +1.82 0 2397 f8b4 d1e2 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 > 3. +1.95 0 7362 d4e5 f1e1 e5d4 > 4. +1.82 0 13241 f8b4 d1e2 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 > 4. +1.82 0 24885 f8b4 d1e2 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 > 5. +1.76 0 45195 f8b4 a2a3 b4a5 d1e2 a5c3 b2c3 d4c3 > 5. +1.76 1 79838 f8b4 a2a3 b4a5 d1e2 a5c3 b2c3 d4c3 > 6? +1.62 1 107812 f8b4 d1e2 b4c3 b2c3 d4f2 > 6? +1.35 3 243750 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4a4 > 6. +1.29 5 384157 f8b4 f2f4 g8e7 d1e2 > 6. +1.29 6 448879 f8b4 f2f4 g8e7 d1e2 > 7! +1.42 6 529311 f8b4 f2f4 g8e7 c1d2 > 7. +1.45 7 592174 f8b4 f2f4 g8e7 c3e2 d4c5 c1d2 f7f5 > 7. +1.63 8 680819 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 > 7. +1.63 9 782412 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 > 8? +1.49 10 834465 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d6h2 h1h2 g8f6 > 8. +1.45 22 1779677 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 > 8. +1.45 24 1936205 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 > 9! +1.58 39 3270488 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 > 9! +1.85 68 5678830 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 > 9? +1.85 69 5756175 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1d2 g8f6 > 9. +1.85 76 6347649 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1d2 g8f6 >10? +1.71 79 6605750 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 >10. +1.66 136 12205057 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 f8e7 >10. +1.66 137 12234960 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 f8e7 > >==> My Move: d4e5 in 2:17 > >I suspect very much that I have compiled some mixture of old and new sources on >the linux machine, perhaps new c- and old h-files. -:) > >So, this should really be named Comet-XXX. I wonder how it plays. Maybe it's X-rated? :-) Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.