Author: Steve Coladonato
Date: 04:07:00 06/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 11, 2002 at 20:43:53, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: >On June 11, 2002 at 12:34:01, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>On June 11, 2002 at 12:12:09, Steve Coladonato wrote: >> >>>Here's the analysis for a position arising out of a Milner-Barry line of the >>>French Defence. I opened up two desktops on Linux and in one ran SCID using >>>crafty for analysis and in the other used Comet for the analysis. I hope I have >>>the correct syntax to get the diagram to display. It took Comet a lot longer >>>than Crafty to get to depth 11 and the line it is displaying is not good for >>>black. >>> >>>Steve >>> >>>[D] r3kbnr/1p1b1ppp/p3p3/3pP3/3q4/2NB4/PP3PPP/R1BQ1R1K b kq - 0 11 >>> >>> Crafty-18.13 >>> Depth: 11 Nodes: 38180437 (122495 n/s) >>> Score: -0.90 Time: 311.69 seconds >>> 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>> >>> 3 -1.27 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qf6 (0.04) >>> 4 -0.87 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd4 13. Qe2 (0.05) >>> 4 -0.87 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd4 13. Qe2 (0.16) >>> 5 -1.01 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bg5 Nf6 (0.18) >>> 5 -1.01 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bg5 Nf6 (0.37) >>> 6 -0.85 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bd2 Nf6 14. Rc1 (0.46) >>> 6 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Qe2 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Bd2 Qc5 (1.36) >>> 6 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Qe2 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Bd2 Qc5 (1.56) >>> 7 -0.88 11. ... Bb4 12. f4 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Rb1 b5 15. Be3 (3.77) >>> 7 -0.97 11. ... Nh6 12. f4 Rc8 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. Bd2 Nf5 (6.74) >>> 7 -0.97 11. ... Nh6 12. f4 Rc8 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. Bd2 Nf5 (7.44) >>> 8 -0.92 11. ... Nh6 12. Bxh6 gxh6 13. f4 Rc8 14. Qc2 Ba3 15. bxa3 Rxc3 (10.86) >>> 8 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Rb1 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Qg4 Qc5 15. Qe2 (21.43) >>> 8 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Rb1 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Qg4 Qc5 15. Qe2 (23.35) >>> 9 -0.71 11. ... Bb4 12. Ne2 Qxe5 13. Qb3 Qd6 14. a3 Bc5 15. Qxb7 Bc6 (45.39) >>> 9 -0.92 11. ... Nh6 12. Be3 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Rc1 d4 15. Ne4 Qe5 (62.49) >>> 9 -0.93 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qc7 15. Qd2 Nf5 (71.48) >>> 9 -0.93 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qc7 15. Qd2 Nf5 (73.37) >>> 10 -0.78 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qxb4 15. Rb1 Qa5 16. Rxb7 >>>Qxa2 (83.49) >>> 10 -0.84 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Re1 Qf2 14. Re2 Qh4 15. g3 Qg4 16. Rd2 >>>Qxd1+ 17. Rxd1 (145.50) >>> 10 -0.84 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Re1 Qf2 14. Re2 Qh4 15. g3 Qg4 16. Rd2 >>>Qxd1+ 17. Rxd1 (178.45) >>> 11 -0.90 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>>(244.93) >>> 11 -0.90 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>>(311.69) >>> >>>COMET-B46 >>>Depth: 11 Nodes: 44858323 (1274 n/s) >> >>The n/s looks peculiar. So, it took 10 hrs to reach this depth ? >> >>The B.46 CB natives reaches depth 11 in a few minutes on Athlon/700. >>The evaluation looks quite different too. >> >>I guess that there is something wrong with the comet-xb. >> >>Sorry, it seems i was too optimistic to try this release without testing. >> >>Uli >> >> >>>Score: -1.32 Time: 35187.00 seconds >>>d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 d3h7 >>> >>> 6 -0.91 f8b4? f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b6 b1b6 c3e5 (137.00) >>> 6 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b5 c1b2 (287.00) >>> 6 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b5 c1b2 (325.00) >>> 7 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 (437.00) >>> 7 -0.97 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c3a4 g8e7 d3a6 (487.00) >>> 7 -1.13 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 (525.00) >>> 7 -1.13 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 (625.00) >>> 8 -0.99 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d6h2 h1h2 f8d6 f2f4 g8f6 (650.00) >>> 8 -0.95 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 (1512.00) >>> 8 -0.95 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 (1725.00) >>> 9 -1.08 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 c3d5 (2387.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 c3d5 (3587.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1f3 g8f6 c1f4 d6b4 f4e5 f8e7 a1c1 (3725.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1f3 g8f6 c1f4 d6b4 f4e5 f8e7 a1c1 (4212.00) >>> 10 -1.21 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 (4575.00) >>> 10 -1.19 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 c1g5 h7h6 g5h4 (9975.00) >>> 10 -1.19 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 c1g5 h7h6 g5h4 (11112.00) >>> 11 -1.32 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 d3h7 (35187.00) > >This illustrates one of the problems with chess engines. d4e5 would be "really >asking for it" in human-human games, assuming that the person playing White was >well versed in this opening. Chess engines "know no fear." They "go where wise >men fear to trod." A person who used their chess engine as a tutor in opening >theory would be making a huge mistake! > >Can be generalized to gambits in general. > >Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.