Author: Steve Coladonato
Date: 04:12:41 06/12/02
Go up one level in this thread
<snip> [D] r3kbnr/1p1b1ppp/p3p3/3pP3/3q4/2NB4/PP3PPP/R1BQ1R1K b kq - 0 11 >>> >>> Crafty-18.13 >>> Depth: 11 Nodes: 38180437 (122495 n/s) >>> Score: -0.90 Time: 311.69 seconds >>> 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>> >>> 3 -1.27 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qf6 (0.04) >>> 4 -0.87 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd4 13. Qe2 (0.05) >>> 4 -0.87 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd4 13. Qe2 (0.16) >>> 5 -1.01 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bg5 Nf6 (0.18) >>> 5 -1.01 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bg5 Nf6 (0.37) >>> 6 -0.85 11. ... Qxe5 12. Re1 Qd6 13. Bd2 Nf6 14. Rc1 (0.46) >>> 6 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Qe2 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Bd2 Qc5 (1.36) >>> 6 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Qe2 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Bd2 Qc5 (1.56) >>> 7 -0.88 11. ... Bb4 12. f4 Bxc3 13. bxc3 Qxc3 14. Rb1 b5 15. Be3 (3.77) >>> 7 -0.97 11. ... Nh6 12. f4 Rc8 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. Bd2 Nf5 (6.74) >>> 7 -0.97 11. ... Nh6 12. f4 Rc8 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. Bd2 Nf5 (7.44) >>> 8 -0.92 11. ... Nh6 12. Bxh6 gxh6 13. f4 Rc8 14. Qc2 Ba3 15. bxa3 Rxc3 (10.86) >>> 8 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Rb1 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Qg4 Qc5 15. Qe2 (21.43) >>> 8 -1.02 11. ... Bb4 12. Rb1 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Qg4 Qc5 15. Qe2 (23.35) >>> 9 -0.71 11. ... Bb4 12. Ne2 Qxe5 13. Qb3 Qd6 14. a3 Bc5 15. Qxb7 Bc6 (45.39) >>> 9 -0.92 11. ... Nh6 12. Be3 Qxe5 13. Re1 Qd6 14. Rc1 d4 15. Ne4 Qe5 (62.49) >>> 9 -0.93 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qc7 15. Qd2 Nf5 (71.48) >>> 9 -0.93 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qc7 15. Qd2 Nf5 (73.37) >>> 10 -0.78 11. ... Rc8 12. f4 Nh6 13. Ne2 Qc5 14. b4 Qxb4 15. Rb1 Qa5 16. Rxb7 >>>Qxa2 (83.49) >>> 10 -0.84 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Re1 Qf2 14. Re2 Qh4 15. g3 Qg4 16. Rd2 >>>Qxd1+ 17. Rxd1 (145.50) >>> 10 -0.84 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Re1 Qf2 14. Re2 Qh4 15. g3 Qg4 16. Rd2 >>>Qxd1+ 17. Rxd1 (178.45) >>> 11 -0.90 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>>(244.93) >>> 11 -0.90 11. ... Be7 12. f4 Nh6 13. Qe2 O-O 14. Be3 Qb4 15. Rac1 d4 16. a3 Qc5 >>>(311.69) >>> >>>COMET-B46 >>>Depth: 11 Nodes: 44858323 (1274 n/s) >> >>The n/s looks peculiar. So, it took 10 hrs to reach this depth ? >> >>The B.46 CB natives reaches depth 11 in a few minutes on Athlon/700. >>The evaluation looks quite different too. >> >>I guess that there is something wrong with the comet-xb. >> >>Sorry, it seems i was too optimistic to try this release without testing. >> >>Uli >> >> >>>Score: -1.32 Time: 35187.00 seconds >>>d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 d3h7 >>> >>> 6 -0.91 f8b4? f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b6 b1b6 c3e5 (137.00) >>> 6 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b5 c1b2 (287.00) >>> 6 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 a1b1 b7b5 c1b2 (325.00) >>> 7 -0.84 f8b4 f2f4 b4c3 b2c3 d4c3 (437.00) >>> 7 -0.97 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c3a4 g8e7 d3a6 (487.00) >>> 7 -1.13 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 (525.00) >>> 7 -1.13 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 c1g5 f8e7 (625.00) >>> 8 -0.99 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d6h2 h1h2 f8d6 f2f4 g8f6 (650.00) >>> 8 -0.95 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 (1512.00) >>> 8 -0.95 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 (1725.00) >>> 9 -1.08 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 c3d5 (2387.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 e1e6 f7e6 c3d5 (3587.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1f3 g8f6 c1f4 d6b4 f4e5 f8e7 a1c1 (3725.00) >>> 9 -1.35 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1f3 g8f6 c1f4 d6b4 f4e5 f8e7 a1c1 (4212.00) >>> 10 -1.21 d4e5? f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 (4575.00) >>> 10 -1.19 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 c1g5 h7h6 g5h4 (9975.00) >>> 10 -1.19 d4e5 f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 c1g5 h7h6 g5h4 (11112.00) >>> 11 -1.32 d4e5! f1e1 e5d6 d1b3 d7c6 h1g1 g8f6 d3h7 (35187.00) > >This illustrates one of the problems with chess engines. d4e5 would be "really >asking for it" in human-human games, assuming that the person playing White was >well versed in this opening. Chess engines "know no fear." They "go where wise >men fear to trod." A person who used their chess engine as a tutor in opening >theory would be making a huge mistake! > >Can be generalized to gambits in general. > >Bob D. In the main line of the Milner-Barry Gambit, I would agree with you. However, in this particular case, with a black pawn on a6, taking the second pawn on e5 should be relatively safe as the a6 pawn keeps the c3 knight out of b5 where in the main line of the Gambit, the knight intrudes on that square with a strong attack. Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.