Author: blass uri
Date: 02:47:51 08/01/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 1998 at 03:14:50, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: >On July 31, 1998 at 22:51:18, blass uri wrote: > >>position: >>2r2rk1/2q2pP1/p1b1pp2/1p6/4P3/2Np3P/PPP3Q1/1K4R1 >>white to move. >> >>Fritz5 arrived to a winning position because it has a better positional >>understanding. >> >>Fritz5 played 25.cxd3 and made a draw when 25.Qd2 is winning for white >> >>Fritz5 using 131072Kbytes hash tables needed almost 30 minutes to find >>Qd2 >>Junior5(16 bit version for fritz) needed 10 minutes and 40 seconds >>using 31000 Kbytes >> >>This is on pentium200MMX >> >>Genius3 needed 42 seconds to find Qd2 on a pentium100Mh with 15 Mbytes hash >>tables. >> >>I think the strong point of Fritz5 is positional understanding >>The weak point of fritz5 is the opening book. >>In tactics it is sometimes weaker and sometimes stronger than other programs >> >>In the first round against Isichess Fritz5 with white came out of the opening >>book with negative evaluation with white. > > >My Fritz5 Powerbooks ends with move 20, >so 21. fxe5 should be the first move out of the book. >But I don´t think it is. >Maybe another book was used in Paris! I think this another book is also a reason for fritz5's failure. In the last round fritz5 lost against Junior because of the opening. I have no powerbook and my book ends with move 20 but I checked the evaluation at moves 19,20,21 and they were negative. Uri > >On my P200MMX 43MB hash with deepth 12/39 >fxe5 is only the 4.th best move. >Here is the evaluation for the 4 moves > >1. Nc2 -0.03 >2. Nf3 -0.31 >3. Ne2 -0.34 >4. fxe5 -0.41 > >Venlig hilsen > >Hans Christian Lykke > > > > > >> >>I believe fritz5's opening book has too many lines stupid humans played. >>It is better to delete lines Fritz5 does not like from the opening book of >>fritz5. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.