Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Solving the "constructor" problem in C++

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 15:38:03 06/12/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 12, 2002 at 18:06:20, Bo Persson wrote:

>>>When did 7.0 come out? Or are you using a beta version?
>>
>>He means .net
>>
>
>Yes. It was called 7.0 for several years until MS marketing settled for .NET
>instead...

I have MS VC++ 6.0 Pro. Is the .NET compiler better, or worth getting? Even if I
have 6.0 Pro?

>It's a rumor nasty enough that it seemed to scare Russell away from using C++
>classes. My point was that the supposedly "dangerous" construct actually didn't
>generate any code at all!

I'm still using classes, and I'd be using them regardless of whether the empty
constructor ran or not.

>The extra abstraction often (in my experience) leads to more readable code, that
>in turn gives more opportunities for simplifying the code.

Gee, that about sums up all of the probems and frustrations I had when writing
my program in C :)

Russell



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.