Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 03:04:05 06/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2002 at 00:06:46, Slater Wold wrote: >Not sure why you got that message. Cause I got your e-mail. > >However, I did not recieve it until about 7am this morning, and these games were >played overnite. > >I will be playing some more games overnite, tonite, and I will post the results >tomorrow. > >It will be against a weaker opponent than Sjeng or Crafty. > > > >On June 12, 2002 at 23:48:57, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 12, 2002 at 22:31:30, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On June 12, 2002 at 20:18:50, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>4 games between Crafty 18.15 and Movei 0.7. >>>> >>>>Crafty ran on a 1.73Ghz with 32MB hash and no book. Pondering was disabled. >>>>Movei ran on a 1.73Ghz with 32MB hash and no book. (Movei doesn't ponder.) >>>> >>>>30/G >>> >>>Did you get the latest Movei that I sent you 19-20 hours ago from the office? >>> >>>I guess that you did not get it based on the opening(1.e4 e5 and 1.e4 c6 is the >>>way that 0.07a plays but I sent you yesterday(almost 24 hours ago movei0.071b). >>> >>>Not that it is going to get a big of difference against Crafty but I hope that >>>it can get more than 10% against Crafty(at least it suceeded to get more than >>>10% in blitz against amyan and list in my tests but I believe that these >>>programs are slightly weaker than Crafty). >>> >>>Note that I do not understand why movei played 1.e4 in games 2 and 4. >>> >>>The public movei always changes the opening from 1.e4 to 1.d4 and again to 1.e4 >>>and the version that I sent you have two options dependent on the file >>>sizeslowbook116.txt >>> >>>With the default option movei use deterministic opening book of one move. >>>if you change the letter d to c movei always changes it's first move starting >>>with 1...a5 and in the next game 1...b6 and in the next game 1...b5 and you >>>continue in that way. >>> >>>I know that it is not close in strength to Crafty and every result that is more >>>than 10% is going to be considered as a good result. >>> >>>I suspect that there was a problem with my email and that you did not get the >>>latest movei so I am going to send you again the latest movei from another >>>address in a few minutes. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>I see that I have problems to send you the latest Movei >> >>I got the following email: >> >> >> >> >>This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields: >> >> Return-path: <blass_n@netvision.net.il> >> Received: from tcp-daemon.mxout1.netvision.net.il by mxout1.netvision.net.il >> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) >> id <0GXM0028CIAIH9@mxout1.netvision.net.il> >> (original mail from blass_n@netvision.net.il); Thu, >> 13 Jun 2002 05:44:45 +0300 (IDT) >> Received: from dialup.netvision.net.il ([62.0.67.40]) >> by mxout1.netvision.net.il >> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) >> with SMTP id <0GXM001W5I9TWY@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for swold@swbell.net; >> Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:44:36 +0300 (IDT) >> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 04:40:38 +0300 >> From: N Blass <blass_n@netvision.net.il> >> Subject: The latest Movei >> To: swold@swbell.net >> Message-id: <001701c2127b$52d71560$2843003e@netvision.net.il> >> MIME-version: 1.0 >> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 >> Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_RW50VtGVC67EcmD0aE0/Kw)" >> X-Priority: 3 >> X-MSMail-priority: Normal >> >>Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients: >> >> Recipient address: swold@swbell.net >> Reason: Server rejected MAIL FROM address. >> Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.0.0 Access denied >> Remote system: dns;sbcmail9.prodigy.net >>(TCP|194.90.9.20|56003|207.115.63.95|25) (vm3-ext.prodigy.net ESMTP Sendmail >>8.12.3 da/8.12.3; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:44:54 -0400) >> >> >> >> >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>Return-path: <blass_n@netvision.net.il> >>Received: from tcp-daemon.mxout1.netvision.net.il by mxout1.netvision.net.il >> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) >> id <0GXM0028CIAIH9@mxout1.netvision.net.il> >> (original mail from blass_n@netvision.net.il); Thu, >> 13 Jun 2002 05:44:45 +0300 (IDT) >>Received: from dialup.netvision.net.il ([62.0.67.40]) >> by mxout1.netvision.net.il >> (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 0.3 (built May 13 2002)) >> with SMTP id <0GXM001W5I9TWY@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for swold@swbell.net; >> Thu, 13 Jun 2002 05:44:36 +0300 (IDT) >>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 04:40:38 +0300 >>From: N Blass <blass_n@netvision.net.il> >>Subject: The latest Movei >>To: swold@swbell.net >>Message-id: <001701c2127b$52d71560$2843003e@netvision.net.il> >>MIME-version: 1.0 >>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 >>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 >>Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN >>Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE >>X-Priority: 3 >>X-MSMail-priority: Normal
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.