Author: Robert Henry Durrett
Date: 11:58:45 06/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2002 at 13:05:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On June 13, 2002 at 11:52:30, Benny Antonsson wrote: > >>[D]8/3k4/8/8/3PK3/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 > > >OK... White to move wins by moving the king in front of the pawn >and assuming the opposition. Any other white move draws. Unfortunately, >the opposition doesn't help you a bit if your opponent can "pass" (which is >what the null-move allows). Pardon my French, but doesn't this make using "null-move" kinda dumb????????? Bob D. > >IE I play Kd5, which wins, but you pass, and now _you_ have the >opposition and the game is a draw. Black is in zugzwang because as it >sits after white plays Kd5, the game is a draw, but as soon as black moves >its king, no matter where it moves to, the game is lost. But null-move >allows it to not move and hold the draw, greatly confusing the search...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.