Author: Peter Berger
Date: 14:12:06 06/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 13, 2002 at 16:01:37, Bas Hamstra wrote: >Of course there are a lot. Differences between stronger engines are very small, >see Leiden 2002. TheKing had slightly outdated hardware, and bang, it sinks to >the middle of the field. And numbers 1 and 2 in Leiden ran at significantly >faster hardware than the rest, coincidence? Give a strong amateur 2x time >advantage and the pro's will lose the last bit of advantage they have. Not many >amateurs can beat TigerPalm? Are you kidding? How about 30? Heck, in Leiden >Comet rolled 3 pro's up in a ball while NOT being on faster hardware: GT and >TheKing and Shredder :-) > >Best regards, >Bas. Uri is usually very careful with his wording ;). He said that there are few programs that can play on a 486 computer and beat Chess Tiger on the Palm. Afaik there aren't 30 amateurs who could do that, or do you disagree? Kind regards, Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.