Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Yes, this is a major improvement of Comet, Ulrich please explain.

Author: Robert Henry Durrett

Date: 14:21:21 06/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 13, 2002 at 16:01:37, Bas Hamstra wrote:

>On June 12, 2002 at 11:26:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On June 12, 2002 at 09:13:44, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:
>>
>>>On June 12, 2002 at 08:39:12, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 12, 2002 at 07:07:23, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Interesting match and stunning start for Comet! What has Ulrich done??
>>>>>
>>>>>Jouni
>>>>
>>>>My next match will be G/60, but only 10 games. Ulrich can you explain what major
>>>>improvements you implemented to the B46 version?
>>>
>>>The  most important change is the increment of the version number. (changes are
>>>tiny, some fine-tuning).
>>>
>>>Seriously, I think that version B.45 would also do better against Crafty at
>>>longer time controls. I guess, that the improvement, which you seem to observe,
>>>is due to 2 reasons:
>>>1st: you changed time control (Comet is generally bad at short times, believe it
>>>or not)
>>
>>
>>I do not believe it.
>>
>>I remember that Comet on 486 could beat palm tiger so it suggest that it is not
>>really bad at short time control.
>>
>>Comet had a significant hardware advantage but there are not a lot of chess
>>programs that can beat palm tiger on 486.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Of course there are a lot. Differences between stronger engines are very small,
>see Leiden 2002. TheKing had slightly outdated hardware, and bang, it sinks to
>the middle of the field. And numbers 1 and 2 in Leiden ran at significantly
>faster hardware than the rest, coincidence? Give a strong amateur 2x time
>advantage and the pro's will lose the last bit of advantage they have. Not many
>amateurs can beat TigerPalm? Are you kidding? How about 30? Heck, in Leiden
>Comet rolled 3 pro's up in a ball while NOT being on faster hardware: GT and
>TheKing and Shredder :-)
>
>Best regards,
>Bas.


That's why I think Crafty will be at the top of the list after next spring.  The
eight-processor Madison computers should be available, and one of those with the
64-bit Crafty riding on it's back should be a "holy terror"!!!

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.