Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 09:09:10 06/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 14, 2002 at 01:18:16, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 13, 2002 at 13:16:49, Jason Williamson wrote: > >>Thats your opinion: >> >>06-08 Premier League 2002 >> >> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 >>1 Hiarcs 8 2733 +115 ** 1½ 01 ½ 1 10 0 ½ 1½ 11 11 11 13.0/18 >>2 Goliath Light 1.5 2653 +188 0½ ** ½ 11 11 ½ 1½ 11 ½ 0 ½ 11 12.0/17 >>3 Junior 7 2740 +71 10 ½ ** 1 ½ ½0 1 1 1½ 11 10 ½1 11.5/17 >> 86.75 >>4 The King 3.12c 2664 +138 ½ 00 0 ** ½ 1 1½ 11 0 11 11 11 11.5/17 >> 77.00 >>5 Chess Tiger 14.0 2740 -9 0 00 ½ ½ ** 1½ ½1 0 11 ½½ ½1 1 9.5/17 >>6 Fritz 7 2800 -91 01 ½ ½1 0 0½ ** 0 ½0 1½ ½ 1 11 9.0/17 >>7 Shredder Paderborn 2708 -33 1 0½ 0 0½ ½0 1 ** 0½ 0 1 ½1 11 8.5/17 >> 61.50 >>8 Nimzo 8 2719 -34 ½ 00 0 00 1 ½1 1½ ** ½ 10 ½1 1 8.5/17 >> 61.00 >>9 Gambit Tiger 2.0 2762 -178 0½ ½ 0½ 1 00 0½ 1 ½ ** ½0 ½ 0½ 6.0/17 >> 53.75 >>10 Yace 0.99.68b 2659 -59 00 1 00 00 ½½ ½ 0 01 ½1 ** 1 0 6.0/17 >> 48.00 >>11 Gromit-3.8.2 2591 -62 00 ½ 01 00 ½0 0 ½0 ½0 ½ 0 ** 1 4.5/17 >>12 AnMon5.21 2518 -84 00 00 ½0 00 0 00 00 0 1½ 1 0 ** 3.0/18 >> > >Assuming that this: > >>4-5 rouds to go. 10'10" Time control. 1.2 Ghz Duron/256 megs. 5 man TBs. > >means 10min+10sec inc on ONE 1.2GHz, your results are ready for the garbage >collector. >IMO of course. :-) >And don't mix them up with games played 40/120 on TWO machines. Oh, you mean games played on two machines using the wonderful CB implementation of auto232 that gives you virtually random results?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.