Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers

Author: John Merlino

Date: 21:44:19 06/14/02

Go up one level in this thread

On June 14, 2002 at 21:24:02, Slater Wold wrote:

I'm a little confused by this one....

>Analysis by Shredder Paderborn:
...
>1.g7 f2 2.Be7 f1R 3.gxh8Q+ Kxh8 4.e6 Kg8 5.Kd7 Rd1 6.Bd6 Rxd3 7.e7 Rf3 8.e8Q+
>Rf8 9.Qxf8#
>  ±  (1.28)   Depth: 14/26   00:00:02  733kN, tb=935

How does a PV that ends in checkmate get an eval of only 1.28???

jm

• Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers Uri Blass 22:29:35 06/14/02
• Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers Koundinya Veluri 22:29:05 06/14/02
• Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers Slater Wold 21:50:50 06/14/02
  • Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers J. Wesley Cleveland 09:38:51 06/15/02
  • Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers pavel 22:17:43 06/14/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.