Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Cute position - difficult for null-movers

Author: J. Wesley Cleveland

Date: 09:38:51 06/15/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 15, 2002 at 00:50:50, Slater Wold wrote:

>On June 15, 2002 at 00:44:19, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On June 14, 2002 at 21:24:02, Slater Wold wrote:
>>
>>I'm a little confused by this one....
>>
>>>Analysis by Shredder Paderborn:
>>...
>>>1.g7 f2 2.Be7 f1R 3.gxh8Q+ Kxh8 4.e6 Kg8 5.Kd7 Rd1 6.Bd6 Rxd3 7.e7 Rf3 8.e8Q+
>>>Rf8 9.Qxf8#
>>>  ±  (1.28)   Depth: 14/26   00:00:02  733kN, tb=935
>>
>>How does a PV that ends in checkmate get an eval of only 1.28???
>>
>>jm
>
>These are cut and pasted evals.  To be honest, I never noticed it.
>
>But it is a good question.  ;)

It might be connected to the fact that the PV given is nonsense.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.