Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 21:07:38 06/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2002 at 21:34:11, Peter Berger wrote:
>On June 15, 2002 at 21:13:54, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>NO! Not at all! Don't worry! The next 12 games might have been 12.5-1/2, the
>>other way round! (Is that not what we are always saying?)
>>S.Taylor
>
>What's your problem ?
>
>If the next post says :
>
>Chess Tiger 14.9(a) on Palm Vx - Genius 4 on 486dx-50 1.0-23.0 - it is clear
>there is a decent problem.
>
>If the next post says Chess Tiger 14.9(a) on Palm Vx - Genius 4 on 486dx-50
>9.5-14.5 you will have a _very_ different impression, won't you ?
>
>Statistical surprises really _do_ happen and there is ample proof. Maybe not
>this time - then all parties will be glad to know. But if there was another
>match , and this time Tiger won 12.5-0.5 I would expect you to be one of the
>readers definitely interested very much.
>
>Did I get you wrong?
>Peter
0.5-11.5 is enough data for me to decide that Genius on this hardware is
significantly (actually very significantly) better.
The next match might end 2.5-7.5, with a little bit of luck for Tiger. Don't
even dream of 5-5.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.