Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 22:37:46 06/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 16, 2002 at 00:15:48, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 15, 2002 at 21:20:17, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>On June 15, 2002 at 21:14:39, Mike S. wrote: >> >>>P3/700, 96 MB hash, CB-Tigers >>> >>>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0: >>> >>>1...Be6 2.a4 Bd7 3.Rd1 Bf8 4.Qf4 Bg7 >>> = (-0.20) Depth: 7 00:00:00 70kN >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 7 00:00:01 310kN >>>1...Bd7 2.Rd1 Bc5 3.Qf4 Be6 4.Nf3 >>> = (-0.08) Depth: 7 00:00:02 366kN >>>1...f6 2.f4 Bf5 3.Bxf5 Nf7 4.Rxe8+ Rxe8 5.Qh4 gxf5 6.Nf3 Bc5+ 7.Kf1 Kg7 8.Qg3+ >>>Kf8 >>> = (-0.10) Depth: 7 00:00:03 577kN >>> = (0.08) Depth: 11 00:00:32 5336kN >>>1...Be6 2.Qh4 Rac8 3.Nf1 Qb6 4.Ne3 Bb8 5.Bd2 Nc4 6.Nxc4 dxc4 >>> = (0.02) Depth: 11 00:01:43 16645kN >>>1...b5 2.Rd1 b4 3.Nb1 Rb8 4.Ba4 Nc6 5.cxb4 Rxb4 6.Bb3 d4 >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 11 00:02:54 28306kN >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 11 00:02:54 28306kN >>> >>>----- >>> >>>New game >>>r1b1r1k1/ppq2p1p/3b2pQ/3pn3/8/2P4P/PPBN1PP1/R1B1R1K1 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: >>> >>>1...Bd7 2.Rd1 f5 3.Bb3 Bc6 4.Nf1 Nf7 >>> ³ (-0.26) Depth: 6 00:00:00 67kN >>> = (0.02) Depth: 7 00:00:00 118kN >>>1...Be6 2.Rd1 f6 3.Nb3 Nf7 4.Qh4 Bh2+ 5.Kh1 Be5 6.Be3 >>> = (-0.14) Depth: 7 00:00:02 391kN >>> = (0.00) Depth: 9 00:00:08 1256kN >>>1...b5 2.Rd1 b4 3.Nb1 Ba6 4.Qg5 d4 5.Ba4 Be7 6.Qf4 dxc3 7.Bxe8 Rxe8 8.bxc3 bxc3 >>> = (-0.04) Depth: 9 00:00:23 3574kN >>> = (0.02) Depth: 10 00:00:35 5100kN >>>1...Be6 2.Rd1 b5 3.Nf1 f5 4.Ne3 Nc4 5.a4 Bf8 6.Qg5 Be7 >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 10 00:00:39 5707kN >>> = (0.02) Depth: 11 00:01:13 11074kN >>>1...f6 2.Qh4 Qf7 3.f4 Nc6 4.Rxe8+ Qxe8 5.Nf3 Bd7 6.Qf2 Qf7 7.Be3 Re8 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 11 00:02:12 20588kN >>>1...f5 2.f4 Bf8 3.Qh4 Be7 4.Qg3 Nc4 5.Nxc4 dxc4 6.Be3 Bd7 7.Qf3 >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 11 00:02:55 26127kN >>> = (-0.02) Depth: 11 00:02:55 26127kN >>> >>>IOW, not in 3 minutes on this computer. >> >>Thanks Mike, the result was as I suspected :-) > > > >I don't know what you suspected but I have news for you: the latest Chess Tiger >finds Bf5 (on fail high) in 64 seconds on my P4-1.6GHz (96Mb hash). > >Just out of curiosity: what did you suspect??? I suspected that Tiger would be a bit slow on this position (relative to the other strong programs that is). I figured its pruning would have some trouble with this particular case... > > > > Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.