Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:45:53 06/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2002 at 12:40:25, Christophe Theron wrote: >On June 17, 2002 at 12:23:17, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>because - as i said - nimzo8 is a very strong chess program. >> >>a pity that nobody recognizes this. > > > >Is there a chess program written after 1900 that you would say is a bad program? >:) > > > > Christophe you don't understand because you don't know that many chess testers believe Nimzo8 is a very weak chess program. From the day i tested Nimzo8, it only produced marvellous results on my machines. i was worried. because others said they had weak results. now nimzo gets kind of strong result against hiarcs. IMO hiarcs is a strong program too. now i wonder how such a "weak" program can get very good score against hiarcs. whatever. we never found out why some people had those weak reslts of nimzo, while i had good results. with all other versions of nimzo (from nimzo guernica - nimzo7.32 etc.) i had weak results. but nimzo8 i liked much. this is the story about the "good results". yes, there is nimzo guernica-nimzo7.32 i would call weak chess program. only nimzo8 is IMO different.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.