Author: John Merlino
Date: 16:00:39 06/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 2002 at 16:43:25, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 17, 2002 at 11:33:37, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>Frohlick,T - Hiarcs 8 >>5bk1/1p4p1/pP3p2/Pq1pn3/8/1r5P/RN1Br1P1/2QR3K b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Hiarcs 8: on a PII 333Mhz with 32MB hash >> >>1...Bc5 >> -+ (-3.01) Depth: 1 00:00:00 >>1...Bc5 2.Rf1 >> -+ (-2.80) Depth: 2/8 00:00:00 >>1...Rxg2 2.Qc8 >> -+ (-3.58) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>1...Rxg2 2.Bc3 >> -+ (-3.92) Depth: 2/9 00:00:00 >>1...Rxg2 2.Qc7 >> -+ (-4.18) Depth: 3/14 00:00:00 >>1...Rxg2 2.Bc3 Qe2 3.Rxd5 >> -+ (-4.80) Depth: 3/17 00:00:00 >>1...Rxg2 2.Nc4 >> -+ (-5.05) Depth: 4/17 00:00:01 >>1...Rxg2 2.Nc4 >> -+ (-5.05) Depth: 4/17 00:00:01 >>1...Rxg2 2.Rf1 >> -+ (-5.30) Depth: 5/17 00:00:02 11kN >>1...Rxg2 2.Re1 Rbg3 3.Rxe5 fxe5 >> -+ (-7.32) Depth: 5/20 00:00:04 46kN >>1...Rxg2 2.Ra1 >> -+ (-7.57) Depth: 6/20 00:00:05 69kN >>1...Rxg2 2.Nd3 Qxd3 3.Be3 Rxa2 4.Rxd3 Rxd3 5.Qe1 >> -+ (-8.26) Depth: 6/24 00:00:11 254kN >>1...Rxh3+ 2.gxh3 d4 3.Qc3 dxc3 4.Nd3 Qxd3 5.Re1 Qxh3+ 6.Kg1 Rg2+ 7.Kf1 Rxd2+ >>8.Kg1 Nf3# >> -+ (-#8) Depth: 6/24 00:00:12 288kN >>1...Rxh3+ 2.gxh3 >> -+ (-#8) Depth: 6/24 00:00:13 296kN >> >>(Frohlick, MyTown 17.06.2002) >> >> >>Art, >> >>You don't need a faster computer--you need Hiarcs 8.0 Are you impressed? I am? >> >>Tim Frohlick > >I am not impressed and I think that a lot of top programs can find it faster >than Hiarcs8 on the same hardware. > >The problem is easy for movei and movei is not close to be the best in tactics. > >Uri I'm not terribly impressed either, since Chessmaster announced Mate in 6 (rather than Mate in 8, as above) in 1/6th the time. Although, admittedly, it was on a machine that was over twice as fast. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.