Author: Mark Young
Date: 10:20:49 08/02/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 1998 at 12:59:51, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: >> >>I agree. Where does Fritz get the nerve to out search the other programs, while >>the other computers impress me with their very pretty and elegant play? I mean >>the other top programs like Chess system Tal are much better programs. I can >>tell by the way they play also. All Fritz does is move aimlessly around the >>board. It does not have a clue. And I don’t care if grandmaster’s say you must >>first have a positional advantage, then only then do you look for a combination, >>because then it must exist. This is total bunk. I know that if I played Garry >>Kasparov, and I just made random moves, I know I could luck out and beat >>Kasparov. This is all that Fritz does. I mean Fritz plays ugly chess. I don’t >>know how many games I have seen fritz play where it starts moving aimlessly >>round the board, as Fritz is prone to do, while the other program has built up >>this very pretty and elegant position. Then Fritz out of shear stupidity starts >>losing pawn or two. I mean it just gives the other program a pawn for no reason! >>And out of shear luck Fritz starts winning the game. I can’t count how many >>times I have seen fritz do this. This is not how chess is played, not if you >>want to impress me. I think we should repeat again what Moritz told us, For all >>those god dame bean counter out there. Rebel 10 playing on a P 90 kicked the >>shit out of Fritz 5 playing on a P II 400 by the score of 10-0 in favor of Rebel >>10. Take that you god dame bean counters, and stick it up your pipe and smoke >>it. > > >Well I don´t smoke so here is the result of my games played with 40/2 > >Fritz 5 P200MMX - Rebel 9(not 10 I know, but anyway) P90 28 - 12 > No need to respond this this one Thorsten. I will take care of your light work. Hans I think you should look at the games again. Then you well see that Rebel was winning it all of your games. If you look again you will see that Rebel played much more human like, and gave a much more elegant game. This makes your results null and void!! Don't try and confuse us with your bean counter antics. It will not work. Did Chess Base put you up to this? People like you and GM John Nunn make me and Thorsten sick. Best Regards Evil-Mark. >Venlig hilsen > >Hans Chr. > > >> >>Keep up the good fight. >> >>Best Regards >> >>Evil-Mark. >> > > > > >> >>>>I am not sure about Junior5 and I should do another test >>>>I think to let Junior5 play against fritz5 all the positions after the 10th move >>>>of black in the match rebel-anand and to see what is the result. >>> >>>I guess you should try to play fritz from the 10th moves, against junior, but >>>also against Hiarcs. hiarcs would not allow fritz to play POSITIONAL ! >>>maybe fritz outsearches hiarcs, but fritz will not impress hiarcs with >>>positional stuff... >>> >>>Yes, the anand matches , especially the 2 tournament games could be interesting >>>to see played by two computers. Why not use the 2 40/120 games and replay them >>>with computers ?! >>> >>>>This will give an indication which program is better in general position >>>>understanding. If Junior's result improves with time than Junior has better >>>>positional understanding. >>>>I hope Junior will win this match >>> >>>I like that you have not seen my statements as a personal attack !! >>> >>>I see your posts very constructive. I hope we can discuss things later... >>> >>>Try the anand-match games instead of the nunn-stuff. >>> >>>>Uri >>>>understanding >>> >>>Thorsten >>>apologizing for his overreaction !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.