Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 08:22:34 06/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 15, 2002 at 18:13:12, Peter Berger wrote: >On June 15, 2002 at 09:04:28, Robert Henry Durrett wrote: > >> >> >>Do these tests provide any information regarding the subject question? >> >>Bob D. >> > >No, they don't. The tests have a different purpose, it is about trying to get an >idea of the strength of Chess Tiger for the Palm with blitz matches against >other chessengines on (much) faster hardware. I have put a longer explanation in >my answer to Thorsten Czub about the goals and results - but don't forget: above >all it's fun to do them :-). > >It is an odd testresult - possible explanations IMHO: > >a.) Genius is much stronger than expected. >b.) Tiger is weaker than expected. >c.) There is a flaw in the setup of the engines. >d.) There is a flaw in the setup of the experiment. >e.) It's simply one very unlikely single result that is unlikely but possible >and the results will change with more games. > >My money is on e.) currently. > >Peter How about 50% "a" and 50% "e"?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.