Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:28:32 06/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2002 at 09:33:20, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 18, 2002 at 07:14:17, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 17, 2002 at 12:45:53, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>you don't understand because you don't know that many >>>chess testers believe Nimzo8 is a very weak chess program. >>> >>>From the day i tested Nimzo8, it only produced marvellous results >>>on my machines. i was worried. because others said they had >>>weak results. >> >> >>There is proof enough how strong/weak Nimzo 8 is. >>That Nimzo 8 produces good results on YOUR machines does not prove that Nimzo 8 >>is strong. Like CSTal did only well on YOUR machines. On all other machines all >>other testers get different results. >>Nimzo 8 is strong enough for you and me to play for, in comparison with the >>other programs Nimzo 8 is definitely behind. > >It is dependent in the programs you compare. > >If you compare Nimzo with The baron or holmes then it is clearly a very srong >program and these programs play in the same league of movei and they are not the >weakest programs. >Uri Sorry for the misunderstanding. Of course I meant comparing with the other current commercials. You can list them up in an order you like and then place Nimzo 8 behind them all.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.