Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:09:03 06/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2002 at 11:28:32, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 18, 2002 at 09:33:20, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On June 18, 2002 at 07:14:17, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On June 17, 2002 at 12:45:53, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>you don't understand because you don't know that many >>>>chess testers believe Nimzo8 is a very weak chess program. >>>> >>>>From the day i tested Nimzo8, it only produced marvellous results >>>>on my machines. i was worried. because others said they had >>>>weak results. >>> >>> >>>There is proof enough how strong/weak Nimzo 8 is. >>>That Nimzo 8 produces good results on YOUR machines does not prove that Nimzo 8 >>>is strong. Like CSTal did only well on YOUR machines. On all other machines all >>>other testers get different results. >>>Nimzo 8 is strong enough for you and me to play for, in comparison with the >>>other programs Nimzo 8 is definitely behind. >> >>It is dependent in the programs you compare. >> >>If you compare Nimzo with The baron or holmes then it is clearly a very srong >>program and these programs play in the same league of movei and they are not the >>weakest programs. > > >>Uri > > >Sorry for the misunderstanding. Of course I meant comparing with the other >current commercials. You can list them up in an order you like and then place >Nimzo 8 behind them all. What was your result of Nimzo 8 vs Gandalf on hardware faster than 1 Ghz ? Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.