Author: martin fierz
Date: 13:47:46 06/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2002 at 13:20:18, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On June 18, 2002 at 13:06:04, Timothy J. Frohlick wrote: > >>I find it interesting that Sjeng never even considered Qxf4 as a good >>sacrifice. >>Must be a bug in the program. > >Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that Rxh5 mates, hmm? > >-- >GCP but your program doesnt see it in 35 seconds! -2.09 is hardly a mate score :-) positions like this should not be counted as "solved" when the right first move appears, but only when the program also sees that this move wins. aloha martin >35 seconds on Athlon XP 1800 > >Engine: Sjeng 12.14 d >by Gian-Carlo Pascutto > >8.31 0:35 -2.09 1.Rxh5 gxh5 2.Rxh5 Re1+ 3.Kxe1 Nxh5 4.Qg5+ Kf8 5.Qxh5 >Re7+ >6.Kd1 Ke8 7.Qh8+ Kd7 8.Qh3+ Kd8 9.Qh8+ Kc7 10.c5 Re6 11.cxd6+ Rxd6 (22.709.877) >649.5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.