Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:33:21 06/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2002 at 18:30:21, Adriano Bedeschi de Souza wrote: >On June 18, 2002 at 18:19:21, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On June 18, 2002 at 18:13:56, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On June 18, 2002 at 17:48:46, Adriano Bedeschi de Souza wrote: >>> >>>>Using mingw for windows >>>>with -O3 >>>>and other minor optimizations >>>>what can it be? >>> >>>Run another profile and show us the output. >>> >>>Are you doing incremental hash updates? >> >>Your subject line makes me suspect something else also. >> >>What functions are you using for timing on Win32? >> >>A factor of 20 can easily be explained by a savagely broken timer. If anything, >>Win32 binaries tend to be faster, not slower. >> >>If you are not nervous about someone looking at your code, I will take a look at >>it and run it through the Intel profiler. > >My code is nothing =) >how can i send it to u? email? Email is fine... dcorbit@connx.com I won't promise any miracles. >about the hash, i disabled it an still getting 4,5 KN/s =) incredible That the speed went up is not surprising. If you get more depth with hash off, then your hashing is severely broken.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.