Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:20:28 06/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 2002 at 02:21:20, Slater Wold wrote: >On June 18, 2002 at 02:08:47, Klaus Friedel wrote: > >>On June 17, 2002 at 19:57:46, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>Just got bored and ran some tests of a few popular engines. I need to clean out >>>the waterblock & radiator for my computer so until then I'll be running 1.76 >>>instead of 1.86ghz. Maybe when I get bored again I'll retest at 1.86GHz(or when >>>I get a Sledgehammer). Anyway here they are... >>> >>>CPU: AthlonXP 1.76GHz unless otherwise specified. >>>BS-2830 test. 15 minutes per position. >>> >>>Engine & hash ELO Comments >>> >>>Nimzo 8 320mb 2801.75 Thunderbird 1.5GHz >>>Hiarcs 8.0 320mb 2778.79 >>>Fritz 7.0.0.8 320mb 2765.65 >>>Shredder 6.02 320mb 2759.11 Thunderbird 1.5GHz >>>Chesstiger 14 192mb 2747.26 >>>Junior 7 128mb 2741.51 Celeron 1GHz >>>Gambit Tiger 2 192mb 2736.82 >>>Crafty 18.15 CB 288mb 2652.01 >>Hagrid 0.7.41 200mb 2597 Athlon XP 1700+ >> >> >>I don't realy trust in the such testsets. Hagrid is far weaker than 2600 ELO... >> >>Bye, >>Klaus Friedel > >Did ya think for 1 second that Nimzo is 2800+ Elo? ELO is (of course) an arbitrary score. Is Nimzo 2800+ FIDE strength against people? I have no idea. I certainly think it is possible. It also might be considerably weaker. Given the lack of data, I don't think we can say. It certainly did well on a human calibrated test. But I think extrapolation to ELO is pretty wild.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.