Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 07:37:08 06/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2002 at 09:41:12, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On June 19, 2002 at 23:08:13, Tim Mirabile wrote: > >>It's hard to even define what constitutes a thread, since threads can split into >>two or more when the root message expires. What I can do is maybe have a next >>message button, since the messages are posted sequentially. > >It could be as easy as offering an anchor for the numerically next >(and possibly previous) message, independant of the thread structure. >i.e. from message 236452 to 23543 and 236451 (from N to N+1 and N-1). > >And when you could place them into the header >(e.g. next to [ Message Listing ] ), >it would appear at the same place in all messages, and clicking through >a next-chain would not even involve any mouse motion :-) >Repeating that in the footer would not hurt either, and would be useful >for long articles. > >I will not use such a feature, but others obviously would like it. > >Cheers, >Heiner Right, even just a link to go to (i.e., read) the next article chronologically would be a huge bonus and I think very easy to implement. And having it at the top is a good idea for the reason you state.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.