Author: Tony Werten
Date: 08:10:17 06/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 20, 2002 at 10:14:21, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On June 20, 2002 at 06:27:56, Dan Andersson wrote: > >>You don't need to make a memory lookup in the 8x16 or the16x16 board. Thats one >>of the gains. > >Yep. But it also needs larger (and possibly less cache efficient) tables, for >example piece square tables for evaluation. Or some "translation array" at this >point. For typical board size tables, this may be no problem. More costly it >will be for a history table. There are 2 solutions for. Excuse my Delphi: trans_square:=((square and $70) shr 1) or (square and $07) or throw out your history tables because they suck anyway. Tony > >Regards, >Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.