Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quad Crafty: AMD Better?

Author: Robert Henry Durrett

Date: 11:51:14 06/21/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 21, 2002 at 14:36:13, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On June 21, 2002 at 08:30:45, Robert Henry Durrett wrote:
>
>>
>>Soon, maybe next Spring, Intel and AMD will have their advanced 64-bit
>>microprocessors out and, hopefully, they will be well-suited for Quad Crafty
>>chess engines.  Will AMD be the winner in this "Crafty Competition"?
>
>Doubt it.  The fastest crafty on SMP will be one with really big on-die cache.
>If the Hammer line makes something with huge cache like the Intel Xeon, then it
>might be competitive.  Eugene's benchmark of a 2 CPU AMD system showed a 40%
>gain for the second CPU.  60% loss is a bit disappointing.
>
>With the Xeon that Bob uses, there is a very tiny SMP loss of only a few
>percent.

Will Itaniums also have this "huge cache" advantage over hammers? Especially
interested in Madison Itaniums compared to equivalent Hammers.

Is there a 64-bit Xeon?  I thought they were all 32-bit.

[Note: Would be misleading to compare 3rd generation of one processor to 1st
generation of the other.  Need to consider what each, Intel & AMD, will have out
at the same time.]

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.