Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this a Rebel/Tiger/Gandalf Boycott?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 01:36:07 06/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On June 21, 2002 at 13:47:02, Frank Quisinsky wrote:

>Hi,
>
>>Still an ignorant dreamer. Those are not just 3 programs, they are co-favourites
>>with chances to win.
>
>For me are all programs important.


I know.


>So for me is not very important which programs are playing, more important is
>that many programs playing and the programmers have fun.


OK, then let us call the wch "fun tournament"?
The definition of World Championship is different.


>>Even if they'd participate, they'd have no chance to WIN and I would cut my hair
>>1mm long in case one of them would win.
>
>Big Nonsens !
>Do you know Chess Wizard, Nightmare or other programs ?
>
>A program which are playing with ~ 2.500 - 2.550 (if Fritz is playing with
>2.650) have "normaly" a chance to win of ~ 20%. A good exemple are my 20
>tournaments "Amateurs vs. Professionals". Goliath won 2 of 20 tournaments.


Cool, eh? How many World Championships did they play? And how did they finish?


>>Tiger, yes. ;-)
>You are a Tiger fan?


Open secret. :)


>>Seriously: Imagine a soccer wch without Argentina, Brasil, England, Ireland,
>>Italy, Cameroon. Does not mater because there are dozens of other countries
>>playing for the title?? You must be joking.
>
>Other countrys can also playing good football.
>Like "Mali", "Ghana" ... Mali is very very strong.


Yes, so strong that it wasn't able to qualify for the wch...


>Now the German "Banana team" is under the last 4 teams, I cann't know this.
>Today the American player are clear better and we see the typical German
>football :-(
>
>But the American players are the moral winner of this game not the German team.
>
>Best
>Frank


Who cares?
May I quote our ex-cancellor Helmut Kohl: "Entscheidend ist, was hinten
rauskommt." (It is the result that counts)
There are MANY countries, like Italy, like Argentina e.g., who would CELEBRATE
reaching the 1/2 final, no matter HOW.
Only the Germans, or at least the German media, have problems with this
attitude. Winning is not enough, winning superior is important. Bullshit. I (and
many others too) prefer reaching the smei-final instead of dropping out of the
tournament but having played attractively.
"Moral winner", that is a loser's excuse.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.