Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 09:53:46 06/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2002 at 11:57:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On June 24, 2002 at 11:34:16, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On June 24, 2002 at 04:13:11, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>looks promising. >>Maybe he REALLY wants to overtake everything else one last time before he >>retires! It would be a great work of art (if so). >>S.Taylor > >i think that the need to participate frequently kills >creativity. > >IMO you should work in secret, and when you believe you have something, >come out and sell it- > >ICCA championships are often not very useful to measure strength. >and they are often not made for the customers to watch or follow, >instead they are made for the programmers to get a title and sell their >programs. > >name, fame , glory. Well you know I am someone who prefers the threuth above nonsens I rather see a program who can reproduce at least 10 perfect games Then a 1000-0 score against Fritz . (the name fame and glory can all be false based on this.) Though mostlikely it will win more games if it can play perfect games! Fritz can come out of openingsbook in a position it doesn't like. It can be to positinal . Maybe the Nunn or Knaak openings would be better. The games which where shown on chessbits where all openings which where more prefereable for Rebel then for Fritz This already doesn't give me a good cleu of the strenght of RebelXP. Only of the weaknes of Fritz! So intresting for Frans You only can learn from mistakes and not from your won games. Getting info about the time used for epd diagrams Doesn't give me a cleu on how strong it is neither. It doesn't show how the game play is Which also was proven by the Rebel Century3 contest! Regards Marc
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.