Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 15:18:44 08/03/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 1998 at 13:40:50, Ed Schröder wrote: snip Hi Ed, Interessting - thx! >From the 506 positions 349 of them are slower or faster than 10%. > >>>Total time Rebel9 : 02:04:57 >>>Total time Rebel10 : 03:00:10 >>>Total percent : -31% > >>Does this mean in this test set, at (presumably) a fixed depth setting, >>R10+Anti-GM(Strong) was 31% slower than R9? (I know Strong Anti-GM setting is >>not as wise as SMART). > >Yes, fixed depth otherwise a comparison on time would make no sense. The >test is done with anti-GM=OFF to make a good comparison with Rebel9. The >-31% comes from the new search algorithm. Indicating more knowledge or (just a slower algorithm:))? snip again Regards, kim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.